Having been a 5 handicapper as a teenager, I didn't play golf for 8 years. In 2007 I started playing golf again, and was given a handicap of 8 by my new club. I set myself a 5 season target to become a scratch golfer, the deadline being 30th September 2011. The clock is ticking.......

Sunday 31 October 2010

Dark Matter – Night Golf, Putting & Holes in One

UK Handicap; 3.3 USGA Handicap; 1.3

I played Night Golf for the first time ever on Friday night. As you can imagine, Night Golf is exactly as it sounds. The tees, greens, bunkers and flagstick are lit by luminous markers, and the golf balls glow in the dark. Other than that it is completely pitch black. We played an event over 8 holes, all fairly straightforward par 4s, and I really enjoyed it.

It was a bit nerve-wracking standing over the first tee shot, having to trust your swing, but I hit a good one down the middle and soon got to grips with it. The balls only go about 70% of the distance of normal golf balls, so the clubbing needs adjusted accordingly. It is the sort of game that isn’t very enjoyable if you don’t hit the ball well, but fortunately for me I actually played quite well, and would definitely play again. It was also a great confidence boost knowing that I can trust my swing, and my ability to hit a ball is driven by a natural swing, rather than a visual adjustment.

On Saturday morning I played in a stableford competition, and once again managed to throw away a good round into the most frustrating result possible – missing buffer zone by one shot.
The main problem was putting; I missed 4 putts of 3 foot or less. When I only get 3 shots to play with in the course of a round, then losing 4 shots so easily is not going to lead to a happy ending. This may have been caused by me, but I’m fairly certain that the condition of the greens was also a factor.

There have been ongoing problems with the greens at my course for years, and a recent agronomist report was quite scathing. The short term impact is that tons of sand have been put on the greens, making short putts quite difficult as some of them break quite a lot and some others stay straight. I have 2 more competitions in 2010, so in theory I could be back up to 4 at the turn of the year, but I’m playing well enough to avoid this, and if I can sort the putting out then I don’t see why I can’t get cut.

I have never named anyone on this blog, but this next bit merits an exception. The round on Saturday was also notable for being the first time I have played with someone who got a hole in one. Having narrowly missed a hole in one by about a foot on the 13th hole (our 4th, as we teed off on the 10th), two holes later Steve Pope hit a beautifully crafted shot that landed on the green, disappeared over a slight slope in the green, and wasn’t seen again until we reached the green, couldn’t see his ball, and peered into the hole. Well done Steve, I enjoyed sharing your celebratory drinks too!

Thursday 28 October 2010

The Cost Of Golf

Regular readers of this blog will know that I have done quite a lot this year; various trips up to Scotland to play, new clubs, lots of tournaments, several lessons. It got me thinking about how much I’ve spent on everything golf related during the course of 2010.

I have been tracking my competition profit and loss, to the penny, all the way throughout the year, so I’ll start with that first.
For the purposes of this exercise, when I enter a competition not all of the fee will be used in prize money, so I split it out between how much of my entry fee goes into the prize fund, and how much is used for other purposes, like green fees, trophies, or any other expenses that the competition organisers incur. For example, the Craw’s Nest Tassie had 345 people playing £185 each, giving an income of £63,825. But only £4,320 is paid out in prize money. So of my £185, only £12.52 (4320 / 63825 x 185) gets attributed to prize money, with the remaining £172.48 going towards green fees.

My fees that went towards prize money this year were £195.61, and I won £458.10 back in prize money, a very healthy return of 134% profit! I split out the ‘Magic 2s’ entry separately (‘Magic 2s’ are where competitors pay an entry, and a dividend is paid out for any 2 that is scored during the competition), and they show an entry of £37.00, and a return of £140.95, this time a profit of 281%!
So overall, my competitive profit and loss was +£366.44, or 157% profit. It’s worth reinforcing that I don’t play golf to win money, anything I do win is a nice bonus but it is not expected and is not the reason I spend hundreds of hours practising each year.

The reason the competition profit is not the be all and end all is because it barely makes a dent in my overall spending on golf over the course of the year.
The full cost of my golf for 2010 comes out at £3,261.60, and is split out into the following categories in the table below;
Based on the number of hours I’ve spent playing golf this year, I calculate that golf costs me £6.85 per hour. A completely uninteresting fact, but a fact all the same.
I put together a short comparison with other hobbies, and how much I estimate they cost per hour;
- Watching Chelsea; £31.00 per hour
- Watching non-league football; £6.00 per hour
- Going to the cinema; £5.05 per hour
- Going to the pub; £5.00 per hour
- Hillwalking; £3.00 per hour
- Going to the gym; £2.60 per hour
- Watching tv; £0.34 per hour
Although golf is more expensive that most of the other hobbies on that list, for me it represents that best value for money by far, due to the combination of the health and social benefits, and the availability of it. Going to the gym is the only other one that I think represents value for money, but is restricted by the number of hours that can physically be completed in a given time period.

I have put together a template budget for next year, which shows a very similar bottom line as 2010, but with the component parts being made up differently;
2010 was an extremely expensive year for new equipment, 11 of the 13 clubs in my bag, as well as the bag itself, were bought this year, and that will not be repeated in 2011. I also won’t be spending so much on green fees as I won’t be going away to play other courses, other than the courses already accounted for in the competitions line.

The saving of over £900 on equipment and green fees is offset by several cost increases for next year. The main three items that take up this cost are; increased membership fees; as I’m going to join a course in Scotland as well as my current home club, as this will allow me to play in a lot more qualifying competitions. Travel & Hotels will take up more cost due to the diary I have planned. Competition profit & loss is budgeted to break even instead of the £366 profit from this year. I certainly expect to make some profit on this item, but like football clubs who budget on being knocked out in the first round of the cup, any profit will be a nice bonus.

So 2011 will cost another £3,200, but it will be worth every penny, and if I get down to scratch then it will be priceless.

Sunday 24 October 2010

How Often Do I Play To My Handicap?

I’ve played 53 rounds of golf that have been for handicap adjustment this season, and my handicap is exactly the same now as it was when I teed off in the first of those rounds.
I was interested to find out the story behind that, and whether there were any clear trends including; how many times I went up, down, or stayed the same (in the ‘Buffer Zone’); whether playing on my home course was an advantage; whether I am an average player in terms of the distribution of these rounds; and what I can learn going into next year.

I looked at these 53 rounds, and where I finished in relation to the CSS for the day. The CSS is the Competition Scratch Score, and is effectively an adjusted SSS (Standard Scratch Score, US equivalent would be a course rating), taking into account the conditions of the day. If I play well I will be under the CSS and my handicap will be cut, if I play poorly I will be over the CSS, and if I am more than 1 shot above the CSS my handicap will increase. My Buffer Zone is being either exactly on the CSS, or 1 shot over.
The basic breakdown of rounds is shown in the table below;

This shows that my handicap went up in just over half the competition rounds I played in, with roughly a quarter resulting in a handicap cut, and a quarter with Buffer Zone. Playing away from my home course showed that I was less likely to get cut, but I wasn’t any more likely to go up either; the rounds that on my home course would have resulted in a cut ended up in Buffer Zone instead.
Looking at a scoring breakdown of the 53 rounds turns up the following graph, with handicap increases in red, Buffer Zone in yellow, and handicap cuts in green.
This graph has an average of CSS +2.2, a median of CSS +2, and a mode of CSS +1.
So how does this compare with the average golfer? Well firstly, it’s difficult to compare generically as the breakdown for a high handicap golfer will look very different to that of a Category 1 (handicap 5 or less) golfer. The CONGU system in the UK is based on achieving a target of CSS + 2, so using this information alone it would appear that I am fairly close to average. There is however a piece of analysis, completed by the Scottish Golf Union and published on the CONGU website, which looks at the distribution of scores for Category 1 players.
I have extrapolated the data to make it the same sample size (53) as my results for this year, and have plotted it on the graph below;
What this shows is that I am more partial to the odd disaster round (CSS +6 or more) than the average Category 1 player, however I am less likely to narrowly miss Buffer Zone (CSS +2 – CSS +5). I am more likely to make Buffer Zone or get marginally cut (CSS -2 – CSS +1), and the big reductions in handicap (CSS -3 or less) are similar to the sample size, although more sporadic in the distribution due to the very nature of them. Taking out the extremes of the table, I am about 1 shot ahead of the score distribution of the average category 1 player.
Simplifying the graph into percentages of cuts, Buffer Zones and increases, backs up this theory.
Forecasting this performance into next year, based on my current diary of 71 competition rounds, would result in 16 cuts, 19 Buffer Zone, and 36 increases. Having modelled performance using a variety of different methods, in order to get to scratch next year, I need to turn 8 of the increases into Buffer Zones, and 8 Buffer Zones into cuts (or alternatively 8 increases directly into 8 cuts, which is effectively the same end result, but it’s a lot more realistic to make a slight improvement in 16 rounds as opposed to a large improvement in 8 rounds). That would result in 24 cuts, 19 Buffer Zones, and 28 increases. Getting my handicap cut 24 times out of 71 rounds is a very tough ask, but at least I can now see the scale of what requires to be done.

In terms of pure scoring, in order to achieve this I need to shave 2 shots of every score next year. That doesn’t sound much, most times I come off of a golf course I can identify at least 2 silly missed putts, or poor chips, or drives into trouble, that have cost me a shot. The difficult bit is eliminating them. The most important rounds to do this in are the ones that are CSS +3 or less. There will always be off days, and the ones that result in finishing more than 3 shots over the CSS should just be written off, thrown in the bin, and forgotten about. The difference between CSS +2 and CSS +1 is 0.1 on my handicap, likewise for every shot below the CSS is another 0.1 closer to scratch. Shaving 2 shots off of a disaster won’t make any difference, but turning a narrow failure into Buffer Zone, or a good round into a very good round, will be where the difference is made next year.

Wednesday 20 October 2010

2010 Review of My Majors

At the start of the season, I set out my targets for the seven major competitions I was scheduled to play in. The diary changed a couple of times, and I ended up playing in 9 competitions that I would call major.
Each competition had it’s own target, but I said at the start of the season that “the overall target for 2010 is to achieve 2 or more (of the individual targets), or 1 or more if the 1 is the Club Championship”.
So how did I do then?

Worman Sword; Target – Top 12, Actual – No Return
This was a complete disaster, from a cash machine swallowing my bank card and refusing to give it back on my way to the course, to being hit by an errant drive in my first round, to the freezing cold despite being in May, and ultimately not returning a score in my 2nd round
Forfar 36 Hole Open; Target – Top 6, Actual – Cancelled due to flooding and replaced with…
Strathmore 18 Hole Open; Target – Top 6, Actual – Tied 2nd
I played really well in this, hitting 14 greens in regulation. I didn’t win anything on countback, but tied 2nd was better than I could have hoped for when I turned up at the course.
Middlesex County; Target – Top 16, Actual – 30th
Mediocrity was order of the day here. Two rounds of 5 over par saw me comfortably miss the cut, but improve on the prior year performance.
Club Championship; Target – 1st, Actual – 2nd
Another one where I improved on last year, but still fell short of the goal. Having said that, I couldn’t have got much closer, being tied after 36 holes and then after another 4 play-off holes, only to lose at the 5th sudden death hole. The four years I have played in this I have finished 12th, 7th, 3rd and 2nd, so if I can maintain the year on year improvement then there is only one place to finish next year.
Aboyne Open; Target – Top 8, Actual – No Return
After 11 holes I was looking at easily hitting target here, only to come across an insanely difficult last 7 holes. The rough was unlike anything I’ve seen in years, I couldn’t keep the ball straight enough off the tee to avoid it all
Royal Montrose Open; Target – Top 10, Actual – 12th
Close but no cigar here, but it felt like an achievement finishing 12th. The wind was gale force, and the time I played got the worst of it, standing up straight was a challenge in itself.
Montrose Golf Week; Target – Last 16, Actual – Last 16
Qualifying was a bit of a struggle, I had a pull a few escapes out of the bag in the closing holes, but my last 32 match went as well as I could have hoped. I just didn’t perform in the last 16 match, but ultimately it was a successful week
Monifieth Open; Target – Top 6, Actual – 12th
Poor start, moderate middle, good finish. Not quite close enough to trouble to engraver, but it was an acceptable performance
Craw’s Nest tassie; Target – Last 64, Actual – 81st
Ultimately this will go down as a failure, but like the Royal Montrose Open, I didn’t get the best deal in regards to the weather and the draw. I have never played in conditions like those that I encountered in the second qualifying round, and the week had a great finish when I knocked it round Carnoustie Championship in 74 shots off the back tees, getting my handicap cut and picking up some cash too.

So, in categorising the 9 competitions, they come out as follows;
2 x Achieved
2 x Nearly Achieved
2 x Improved on Prior Year but Not Achieved
3 x Not Achieved

My goal was to achieve 2, and I achieved 2, so going by the literal interpretation of my targets 2010 was a success. The fact that I didn’t achieve target in any of the three most important (Club Championship, County Championship, and Craw’s Nest Tassie) takes the shine off it, and also my handicap being exactly as it was at the start of the season is a bit of a downer, but a positive way of looking at it is that I have a lot next season that I can improve on.

Monday 18 October 2010

The Late Eight - Rounds 6-8

UK Handicap; 3.2 USGA Handicap; 1.3

The last three main competition rounds of the year took place over the weekend just past, with mixed results.

Friday saw a steady start, 9 pars and a bogey in the first 10 holes, and 80 yards short of green on the par 5 11th in 2 shots. Looking to get a birdie, worst case scenario a par. One monumental full-blooded shank later, closely followed by two hacks out sideways from terrain where it would be difficult to locate a Chilean miner, and my round was taking a slightly different perspective. I steadied myself to have another 6 pars, before a minor calamity on the last where I missed an absolutely tiny putt to end up with a 4 over par 75. It looked as if this may have an impact on my handicap, going up instead of staying the same, however when the results were published today I managed to scrape by with no adjustment either upwards or downwards.

The rounds on Saturday and Sunday were very similar; poor start, great middle, mediocre end.

On Saturday I was 5 over par after 5 holes, before a little run of birdie, par, birdie, par, birdie around the turn got me back to 2 over. I blew up a little on my 15th & 16th holes, dropping 3 shots over the 2 of them, including a wasteful short putt that bounced all over it’s path. It was this putt that cost me in the end, as my 76 meant I missed the buffer zone by 1 shot and moved back up to a handicap of 3.4.

Sunday didn’t have quite as bad a start as Saturday, but I was 2 over par after 8. This time I got three birdies again, but they came consecutively instead of in the space of 5 holes. Once again I got a bit wasteful, missing a very short putt on the 13th and 3-putting the 15th (have you noticed a trend here yet?), but ended up with a one over 72, getting 0.2 off my handicap, and once again returning to 3.2.

My 6 rounds over the last two weekends have been 75, 71, 72, 75, 76 and 72, yet I’ve only managed to get 0.1 reduced from my handicap. I’m reluctant to call it luck, or karma, maybe it’s just fate, but I consider myself a bit harshly done by to have scored fairly well and consistently, and not seen much rewards for my efforts in terms of my handicap moving downwards.

Part of the problem, and a big elephant in the room, is that the greens are in pretty poor condition. I appreciate that they require maintenance, and occasionally this will require them to be cored or tined, but when the ball is bouncing all over the place, even from short distances, then it makes a huge difference to everyone, but moreso to the lower handicap players who have less shots to play with during the course of a round. A non-golfer reading this will probably think ‘typical golfer, blaming the greens when he misses a putt’, but there is some quite scathing criticism of the green conditions coming from various parties at the moment, it’s not just me making up excuses.

Over the 3 rounds I missed 9 putts of 6 feet or less, 3 of which were within 2.5 feet. I’m not claiming that I would have holed all 9 of these putts on better quality greens, but I would expect to hole at least 7 of them. Plotting that into my database, 7 of the 9 putts being holed would have seen me playing off 2.6 instead of 3.2. Now this is all hypothetical, I’m aware that I scored what I scored, and I can’t change that now, but the purpose of saying all of this is to demonstrate that there are some factors that can hinder the quest to get down to scratch. I can accept playing poorly and not being rewarded for it, but I’ve been playing well, hitting lots of greens in regulation (13, 12, 11, 13, 11, 12 in the last 6 rounds), but these 2 or 3 short putts per round are the difference between static and progress. I would love to putt on greens where I know exactly where the ball will go, and until I can do that more consistently it’s going to be an uphill battle, but one I still believe is achievable, to get down to scratch.

Although this is the end of the main season, there are a couple of competitions over the next month, which may or may not count for handicapping purposes. However, as far as I’m concerned a line has been drawn under the 2010 season, and I have plenty of interesting pieces of analysis to share over the next few posts regarding what has happened over the past 9 months.

Sunday 10 October 2010

The Late Eight - Round 5 + Am-Am

UK Handicap; 3.3 USGA Handicap; 1.9

There was just the one handicap qualifying round this week, but two rounds in total on Saturday, as I was called up to play in an Am-Am on Saturday afternoon. An Am-Am is where 3 players are grouped with a top amateur, there is a team event but the amateurs also play between themselves for separate prizes.

First of all the morning round, and with the course set up for the Am-Am later in the day it meant the tees were just about as far back as they could go, and some of the flags were in particularly difficult positions. When playing 36 holes in one day, it is generally a good idea to wake up more than 35 minutes before the first tee time, however I didn’t do that today so meant that it was a bit of a rushed start, which may explain why I found myself 3 over par after 6 holes.

I managed to steady the ship a bit after that, 4 pars then a birdie, before dumping an approach shot into the water on the 12th. Not for the first time this season, I took the plunge and played the ball out of the water, making it to just off the back of the green, and then proceeded to waste the recovery by taking three more to get down. So 4 over par after 12 wasn’t exactly a great position, but I managed to par the last 6 holes for a respectable 75, meaning my handicap goes neither go up or down.

For the Am-Am, I was one of the ‘top amateurs’, so knew I needed to perform to justify my selection. It was also a chance to compete against some of the top amateurs in the county, and see where I am in relation to them.
I started quite well by sinking a monstrous putt for birdie on my first hole, and followed it up with 5 pars before an unusually volatile stretch of birdie, bogey, birdie, bogey, bogey to get me back to level par, before 7 pars in a row saw me finish with a 71.

For the second Saturday in a row, my first round of the day counts for my handicap and I don’t get cut, and my second round of the day doesn’t count for my handicap, and I would have been cut if it had. It’s very frustrating, I am showing that I can shoot the scores, I’m just doing it in the wrong competitions as far as my handicap is concerned.

When I got into the clubhouse I was delighted to see that the lowest score was 71, with 4 people including me having shot that number. With there being 4 prizes it was decided to pool the prize money and split it equally, rather than doing a countback of the best last 9, 6, 3 and 1 hole. So I was a joint winner out of the 17 amateurs, and picked up a bit of cash for it too.

This is a great confidence boost, I now know that I can mix it with the real top amateurs. Okay, I had local advantage, and it’s only a one-off, but the bottom line is that I shot the joint lowest score, and shared the prize with people who have won 4 County Championships between them in the last 7 years, as well as beating some really good players by several shots.

Next week is potentially a big week, with competitions on Friday, Saturday and Sunday, I need to try and retain this good form and make sure I can replicate it when it matters for getting my handicap reduced.

Tuesday 5 October 2010

Oh No - Not This Again

6 months ago I wrote a post about the administration of the golf club of which I am a member, which turned out to be quite controversial.

I basically highlighted the regular errors made in administering the golf aspect, wrong handicap adjustments, arbitrary cuts in handicap, wrong winners of competitions being announced, and despite being anonymous (I have never named any individual or body negatively on here) and factually correct, some people it appears don’t embrace being told of errors. I can understand that attitude. However, the post achieved its goal in that these errors were brought to the surface, and I believe that an effort was made to try and improve things.

It’s disappointing and frustrating then, that 6 months later, that things appear to have slipped again.

The first competition I played in last Saturday was for all of the stableford winners of the previous 12 months, a total of 29 possible entrants, but excluding multiple winners the maximum field was probably in the region of 24.
The first contact to the people who had qualified to play in this wasn’t until Wednesday, less than 72 hours before the competition. This didn’t give people much time, and I’m sure that with the lack of notice some people, who would have been available if notified 2 weeks ago, were now no longer available to play. The final field on Saturday was a pitiful 7, a real devaluation of the competition which should be one of the main competitions of the year, after all it is effectively a ‘champion of champions’ event.

Furthermore, and I can’t state this as fact but I believe it to be true, whilst on the first tee there were other people playing a normal Saturday morning social game going down the tenth hole, who said that they had won a stableford during the previous 12 months but hadn’t been contacted at all to see if they were available to play.
Some people may say that I shouldn’t complain, as it’s easier to win a 7 player event than a 24 player event, but that isn’t the point. Everyone who qualified should be given the full opportunity to play, and given as much notice as possible.

I also mentioned earlier this year about how I was presented with the Order of Merit last year despite proving that I hadn’t won it. This year’s order of merit finishes a week on Sunday, and so far 28 of the 30 events have been played. So how am I doing this year? Well, I haven’t got a clue, as there has not been a single update posted in the clubhouse of the current scores after any of the 28 events played so far. Like the other competition above, the Order of Merit should be a big deal, that people can aspire to winning and check their placing in the table as the year progresses. What use is a year long competition if no-one knows how they are doing?

Last year I calculated the Order of Merit results myself by downloading the results, and then using a bit of Excel wizardry. So why haven’t I done that this year? The reason is that the online results facility has been out of action for a full 8 months now. Originally this was due to an intellectual property rights issue between the software providers, these things happen, but I would expect a resolution in less than 8 months, whether it be with the current providers sorting their issue proactively, the golf club applying pressure for it to be fixed, or terminating the contract and moving elsewhere. 8 months without the ability to look at results is a really poor show, regardless of the reason given. The only way of finding out a result is to go to the golf club once the results have been published. Importantly, no online access makes it much more laborious to find out the CSS of a competition, which is required when I am in Scotland and have a competition the following week; I need to know what my adjusted handicap is.

As I’ve said before, some people want to play social golf and couldn’t give a monkeys about competitions and handicaps, and that is absolutely fine, but those who do care are being short changed, and deserve better. I believe that this feeling is growing amongst the golfers who are competition and handicap aware, and I am not a lone voice.

I really hope I’m not sitting here in another 6 months writing about the next multitude of problems, maybe with it being the end of the season there is the opportunity for stock to be taken and improvements developed over the winter. I hope so.

Sunday 3 October 2010

The Late Eight - Rounds 2-4

UK Handicap; 3.3 USGA Handicap; 2.2

I’ve played three rounds since the last update, and as you can see by my handicap above, the target of getting down to 2 by the end of the season is fast evaporating. That’s not to say it’s all doom and gloom, as there has been some half decent golf, but in true sods law format, it hasn’t reduced my handicap.

Round 2 was last Sunday, and once again I managed to use all 3 shots I receive in the course of a round by the time I walked off the 2nd green. Getting off to a good start is vital with such little room to manoeuvre, and dropping any shots early on creates an uphill battle. By the time I reached the ninth tee I was 7 over par, and all hope of cutting cut, or even maintaining my handicap, had gone. With the pressure off I managed to play the last 10 holes in one over par, but it was too little too late.

Rounds 3 and 4 were both played yesterday, and the first round was played in a combination of weather, from thick fog at the start (see photo), to glorious sunshine, to cloudy and breezy.

I managed to scramble it around the first 8 holes in 2 over par (including another 2 on the 3rd hole, my 10th 2 on that hole in 43 times I’ve played it this year), and with 3 easy holes to come I was confident of being no worse than 1 over par on the 12th tee. Whether it was complacency, whether it was just poor golf, goodness knows, but I played these three holes in 4 over par. I have to admit I lost interest a bit after that, as the round had gone, and I just played my way in without much focus on my score.

Round 4 was a 35 player event in the afternoon, which due to the nature of the event (full handicap stableford) I gave myself no chance of winning, but thought I could go out and give my best and try and get my handicap cut. Well, that was until I found out that it wasn’t a qualifying competition, and the scores would not count towards handicap adjustment. This isn’t a moan about this round in particular, I accept the decision that it wasn’t a qualifying competition (I was sure the same competition in previous years was a qualifying competition, that’s why I thought it would count for handicap this year) or a criticism of anyone in particular, but the UK really needs to review what counts as a qualifying competition. As far as I am concerned, where there is a group of people playing in a group for a prize, and the competition states that the rules of golf are adhered to (i.e. all holes are putted out, there isn’t a restriction on the number of clubs used, etc etc) then I don’t understand why it isn’t mandatory for the scores to be submitted for handicap adjustment. In 2010, with the advent of Inactive Handicaps for players who haven’t submitted 3 qualifying scores in the past year, it should be doubly relevant.

Anyway, back to the round, and on the back of the news that this wouldn’t count for handicap, I went out and played really well to score 38 points, which would have got at least 0.2 reduced had the score been submitted. I had 3 birdies and 4 bogeys, hitting 13 greens in regulation and 32 putts, very very close to my standard target of 14 and 32.

To my utter amazement, although with hindsight maybe because; the conditions were difficult with some rain, the course was playing long, and the greens were like putting on a pinball machine, my 38 points was good enough to win the competition. Playing against 34 players with higher handicaps, there is generally at least one person who has a good day and comes in with a score well better than their handicap. But it didn’t happen yesterday, so I was delighted to pick up the trophy.

This blog focuses on my handicap, I see that as my trophy. I’m not normally bothered by actual physical trophies, in the 3.5 years I’ve been in my current golf club I’ve won; A silver plate, a carriage clock, a glass decanter, a set of 4 crystal tumblers and on 7 separate occasions a crystal glass for winning a monthly medal / stableford, with another trophy of some description on the way for a competition I won a few weeks ago. They sit in a cupboard in my house, most have never even been looked at. This is the first time I’ve won an actual trophy, something with two handles and a cup, so it’s gone in pride of place to be looked at for the next year, where I’ll either have to give it back, or try and win it for another year.

So, four competitions rounds left, one of which is next weekend, then a triple header of the following Friday, Saturday and Sunday to finish the competitive season.